News and views about philosophy, the academic profession, academic freedom, intellectual culture, and other topics. The world’s most popular philosophy blog, since 2003.
I disagree with the perspectives described here and wrote with my co-authors on the very real catastrophic potential of AI…
I don’t have much to say beyond: (1) I emphatically agree with everything Berg says, and (2) I am appalled…
I don’t think focusing on the label matters so much for answering the question. Substitute “artificial intelligence’, if you don’t…
It just occurred to me that one could subject one of the major AI companies’ LLMs to the aforesaid experiments…
Conversations about Pangram frequently involve people who say they’ve seen evidence it doesn’t work, but can’t produce it, so I’ll…
Replying to DW’s reply to me: Let’s grant Pangram is reliable in the standard cases (I still don’t fully trust…
I’d assumed Brian Garrett’s comment was meant as parody.
A remarkable catalogue, that deserves to be shared widely. Unless the courts, the other branches of government and civil society get serious about this soon, we're doomed. (As Professor Dorf notes, only one law professor of the 35 that the NYT consulted tried to make excuses for this orgy of lawlessness–Adrian Vermeule of Harvard [see, e.g.,].)
Leave a Reply